EN
Customer support & chatText

Text: features, prices and limits in 2026

Text combines an AI agent, live chat, an inbox and a helpdesk. The platform is aimed at teams that want to connect customer support and sales conversations in one environment.

View Text →
At a glance

When to compare Text?

Consider it if your team switches between several tools to understand and handle a request. Bringing them together may simplify follow-up, but you still need to define responsibilities and handover rules. Compare the features actually included before replacing your current setup.

In this review
PositioningCustomer service platform with chat, tickets and AI
Cost to watchthe users, AI quotas and advanced features
Profileteams seeking to bring conversations, tickets and automation together
SourceOfficial documentation

Text at a glance

Prices19 $US/user/month (Essential, annual billing)
Ideal user profileteams seeking to bring conversations, tickets and automation together
HighlightsAI agent and human chat · Inbox and tickets
LimitsFor a showcase site with a few messages per week, grouping many functions may not be necessary. A team with...
AlternativeNo second review covering the same scope
Official interface
Text interface displaying customer conversation tracking in real time
Conversation tracking view presented on the official Text websiteProvider source: text.com ↗Capture verified the 20 September 2026 · the interface can evolve.
Reading the interface

Text interface: what this capture shows

Conversation-tracking view presented on Text’s official website. Logicelio uses this screenshot as a visual reference alongside its positioning as a “Customer service platform with chat, tickets and AI” and its AI agent and human chat, Inbox and tickets, and Ecommerce connections features. This image does not constitute a test of the software.

The capture comes from an official Text resource.

View Text →

Documented review · Logicelio’s assessment

What to remember before choosing Text

Assess Text through the continuity between automated replies and human intervention. The platform offers a shared inbox, knowledge tools and optional AI features. Before automating, define which requests can be handled using stable rules and which need a team decision.

Price checked19 $US/user/month (Essential, annual billing)

Price checked on 26 September 2026; check the current price before choosing.

Documented termsPlan limitations

What Text offers on a daily basis

01
Human support can remain the starting point

The platform combines automated responses and team intervention. Set a perimeter where automation is acceptable and keep a clear recovery procedure for other cases.

The function page specifies that the agent AI and the co-pilot are optional layers. A team can start by organizing conversations and tickets, and then add automation on a documented perimeter. This facilitates the assessment of its actual contribution.

02
Resolution is a unit defined by the service

The conversations and requests to follow are gathered in the same environment. Evaluate the ease of finding a client and distinguishing an ongoing exchange from a file awaiting action.

The help describes the events that matter in the use of the agent. Compare this definition to your own solved folder criterion. A ticket that returns or requires a human correction must remain visible in the operational evaluation.

03
Knowledge sources require maintenance

Text includes Shopify, WooCommerce and WordPress integrations. Check the information and actions available in your shop, without assuming that a connector covers all your processes.

Assign each procedure to an official and a review date. An old trade rule can be repeated on a large scale if it remains in the base. The source control must accompany any extension of the agent.

04
The API can form an additional budget

The vendor highlights the reconciliation between conversation and revenue. Consider these indicators as monitoring tools to be checked, not as an additional revenue promise.

Platform documentation describes a call billing beyond certain thresholds. If your project is based on custom integrations, estimate will separate them from the seats and the AI. A useful integration must also have a responsible person in case of failure.

When this option makes sense

Who it is for: Teams that want to unify request handling while keeping human handover available.

When to look at another approach: Do not confuse AI resolution, conversation and call API. These units describe different uses and may result in separate costs.

A company that wants to bring together several channels

Text deserves a comparison if unification improves the recovery of records and if meters remain understandable. Start with a stable service and procedures. The revenue promise of the vendor is not a measure of the result on your business.

Price: what you really need to budget

Limits that may change your mind

Do not confuse AI resolution, conversation and call API. These units describe different uses and may result in separate costs. The function page specifies that the agent AI and the co-pilot are optional layers. A team can start by organizing conversations and tickets, and then add automation on a documented perimeter. This facilitates the assessment of its actual contribution.

Sources of these limits
Preparing your decision

Three checks to see if Text suits you

Compare human processing and automated response on a small set of documented requests.

  1. Set perimeter

    Separate informative responses and decisions that require a person.

  2. Test the relay

    Control context transmitted, refusal of action and recovery off schedule.

  3. Measuring units

    Follow seats, resolutions and technical calls separately, then customer returns.

Text at a glance

SoftwarePositioningProfileCost to watch
Text this reviewCustomer service space combining conversations, tickets and functions AITeams that want to unify request handling while keeping human handover availableseats, AI resolutions and possible technical uses

Read the replacement criteria →

Scope of the documentation

Interface language: incomplete documentary verification.

No third-party test cited; documentary review only.

Sources used for this review
Method: this page does not report a timed workflow in Text. No duration, step count or score is presented as a measurement conducted by Logicelio.

Documentary review of 27 September 2026. No connected channel or automated agent activated.

Sources and methodology

Logicelio newsletter

The right tools, without spending hours comparing.

Receive new Logicelio guides and comparisons, along with offers and benefits from our partners when they are relevant to freelancers and small businesses.

  • New guides and comparisons
  • Partner offers and benefits
  • Free 2026 invoicing guide after signing up

Your email address is used for the newsletter. The 2026 invoicing guide is included as a free bonus after signing up. Privacy.

View Text →