EN

Home › Tools › Alternatives to Asana

Alternatives

Alternatives to Asana

Asana will not suit every business. Use the replacement criteria below and compare reviews covering the same needs where available.

From Asana

What to preserve if you leave Asana

Asana is presented as a task and deadline management tool for overseeing multiple projects. Its review focuses on teams whose delivery depends on shared responsibilities and deadlines. Before migrating, check that the new solution actually improves this aspect without creating difficulties around paid members, the level of project oversight and optional extras.

The point specific to Asana: Asana becomes really different from a simple task manager at the Starter level and then Advanced: Gantt, reporting, automation, portfolios and objectives structure the rise in range.

Personal is free for up to 2 users with unlimited tasks and projects.
Starter is listed at $10.99 per user/month with annual billing and adds, among other features, Timeline, Gantt, reporting and unlimited automation.
Advanced is displayed at 24,99 $ per user/month annually and adds portfolios, objectives and resource management.

Your reference

Task and deadline management across multiple projects

Profile to protect

teams whose deliveries depend on shared responsibilities and deadlines

Cost to watch

the paid members, level of management features and additional options

Migration test. Organize a customer delivery with writing, editing and validation by checking the effect of a delay.

Same need, different approaches

The options to compare

Each alternative below is compared with Asana in terms of its purpose, intended users and main cost drivers.

Comparison scope: Project management. Compare the same use case and the terms of the selected plan.

Productivity & project management

ClickUp

Task, document and project view management in a shared workspace

To confront Asana: small teams that want to bring several uses together with a designated administrator. Costs to check for ClickUp: workspace seats, guest access, AI options and configuration; for Asana: paid members, the level of project oversight and optional extras.

Profile: small teams that want to bring several uses together with a designated administrator
Cost to watch: the workspace seats, guest access, AI options and configuration

Read the analysis →View ClickUp on the official website →

Productivity & project management

GanttPRO

Visual planning centred on a Gantt chart

To confront Asana: managers who need to explain the sequence of steps in a project. For GanttPRO, watch the selected team size, the plan and the workload management required; for Asana, watch paid members, the level of project oversight and optional extras.

Profile: managers who need to explain the sequence of project stages
Cost to watch: the selected team size, plan and workload management needed

Read the analysis →View GanttPRO on the official website →

Productivity & project management

Nozbe

Organisation of tasks and discussions linked to projects

To confront Asana: small teams that want discussions to stay attached to the work to be done. Costs to check for Nozbe: premium users, active projects and history retention; for Asana: paid members, the level of project oversight and optional extras.

Profile: small teams that want to find discussions alongside the work to be done
Cost to watch: the Premium users, active projects and history retention

Read the analysis →View Nozbe on the official website →

Productivity & project management

Taiga

Agile project management with Kanban, Scrum and issue tracking

To confront Asana: teams who know how to organize a backlog and want to choose their hosting mode. The cost to monitor side Taiga is hosting, storage, administration and support, against paying members, the level of management and the additional options side Asana.

Profile: teams that know how to organise a backlog and want to choose their hosting method
Cost to watch: the hosting, storage, administration and support

Read the analysis →View Taiga on the official website →

Productivity & project management

Wrike

Project and workflow management with growing oversight capabilities

To confront Asana: teams that coordinate several contributors and regular approval workflows. Costs to check for Wrike: the minimum number of seats, optional extras and the level of resource management; for Asana: paid members, the level of project oversight and optional extras.

Profile: teams coordinating multiple contributors and regular approval processes
Cost to watch: the minimum number of seats, options and level of resource management

Read the analysis →View Wrike on the official website →

Method

Do not change the tool for one more function.

Test the same scenario in two products. Same data, same duration. If the alternative does not remove any concrete blocking, migration is probably not worth the time it will cost.